Benchmarking Terminology for Protection Performance
draft-kimura-protection-term-02
| Document | Type |
Expired Internet-Draft
(individual)
Expired & archived
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Shigeru Kimura , Jerry Perser | ||
| Last updated | 2003-10-27 | ||
| RFC stream | (None) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
This document addresses common terminology and metrics for the performance benchmarking of sub-IP layer protection technologies: Automatic Protection Switching (APS) for SONET/SDH, Resilient Packet Ring (RPR) for Ethernet, and Fast Reroute for Multi-Protocol Label Switching (MPLS). The benchmarks describe the performance based on the effects in the IP-layer, to avoid dependence on a specific sub-IP layer protection technology.
Authors
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)