Network Working Group                                      Jiankang. Yao
Internet-Draft                                                 Jian. Jin
Intended status: Standards Track                                Wei. Mao
Expires: February 12, 2011                                         CNNIC
                                                         August 11, 2010


       Alias algorithm identifier assignment mechanism for DNSSEC
                draft-yao-dnsext-alias-algorithm-00.txt

Abstract

   DNS Security Extensions (DNSSEC) has been developed to provide origin
   authentication and integrity protection for DNS data by using digital
   signatures.  The DNSKEY, RRSIG, and DS RRs use an 8-bit number to
   identify the security algorithm being used.  More and more new
   RRTYPEs will appear in future.  This document defines an alias
   algorithm identifier assignment method for DNSSEC 8-bit algorithm
   numbers.

Status of this Memo

   This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
   provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.

   Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
   Task Force (IETF).  Note that other groups may also distribute
   working documents as Internet-Drafts.  The list of current Internet-
   Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.

   Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
   and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
   time.  It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
   material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."

   This Internet-Draft will expire on February 12, 2011.

Copyright Notice

   Copyright (c) 2010 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
   document authors.  All rights reserved.

   This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
   Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
   (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
   publication of this document.  Please review these documents
   carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
   to this document.  Code Components extracted from this document must



Yao, et al.             Expires February 12, 2011               [Page 1]


Internet-Draft                  alias-alg                    August 2010


   include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
   the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
   described in the Simplified BSD License.

   This document may contain material from IETF Documents or IETF
   Contributions published or made publicly available before November
   10, 2008.  The person(s) controlling the copyright in some of this
   material may not have granted the IETF Trust the right to allow
   modifications of such material outside the IETF Standards Process.
   Without obtaining an adequate license from the person(s) controlling
   the copyright in such materials, this document may not be modified
   outside the IETF Standards Process, and derivative works of it may
   not be created outside the IETF Standards Process, except to format
   it for publication as an RFC or to translate it into languages other
   than English.


Table of Contents

   1.  Introduction  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
     1.1.  Terminology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
   2.  Motivation  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
   3.  The Alias algorithm identifer assignment  . . . . . . . . . . . 3
   4.  Validating the RRSIG for the new RRTYPE . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
   5.  Compatiliable with the old vaildating resolver  . . . . . . . . 4
   6.  IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
   7.  Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
   8.  Acknowledgements  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
   9.  Change History  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
     9.1.  draft-yao-dnsext-alias-algorithm: Version 00  . . . . . . . 5
   10. References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
     10.1. Normative References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
     10.2. Informative References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
   Authors' Addresses  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6

















Yao, et al.             Expires February 12, 2011               [Page 2]


Internet-Draft                  alias-alg                    August 2010


1.  Introduction

   The DNS Security Extensions (DNSSEC) [RFC4033], [RFC4034], [RFC4035]
   and [RFC5155] were developed to provide origin authentication and
   integrity protection for DNS data by using digital signatures.  Every
   DNSKEY, RRSIG, or DS RR contains an algorithm code number.  These
   algorithm numbers help validators to identify which cryptographic
   algorithm was used.  The algorithm numbers which can be used is
   within 256.  More RRTYPES will appear in future.  The new RRTYPE may
   use the alias algorithm number.  In order to prevent the new RRTYPE
   unaware resolvers from attempting to validate responses from the
   RRTYPE signed zones, some specification might request to allocates
   the new DNSKEY alias algorithm identifiers for the current algorithms
   used.  For example Algorithm 6, DSA-NSEC3-SHA1 is an alias for
   algorithm 3, DSA.  This is not a new algorithm, just an additional
   identifiers for the existing algorithm.  The new RRTYPE unaware
   resolvers will not know these new identifiers and treat responses
   from the new RRTYPE signed zone as insecure, otherwise the new RRTYPE
   RR will be regarded as bogus if there is no such a mechanism.  Using
   other alias algorithms for the new RRTYPE requires allocation of a
   new alias algorithm numbers.  Based on the rule of first come first
   served, the 8-bit algorithm allocation pool would soon be exhausted
   if more and more new RRTYPEs and algorithms had appeared in the DNS
   protocols.  This document defines an alias algorithm number
   assignment for the DNSSEC 8-bit algorithm numbers.

1.1.  Terminology

   All the basic terms used in this specification are defined in the
   documents [RFC1034] and [RFC1035].  DNSSEC related terms are defined
   in [RFC4033], [RFC4034], and [RFC4035]


2.  Motivation

   This document tackles the problem that the new RRTYPE requests the
   alias algorithm number assignment but the algorithm number space is
   not enough.


3.  The Alias algorithm identifer assignment

   Every algorithm identifier that might be used for the new RRTYPE
   should have the alias identifier.  Based on the current algorithm
   which has been allocated, the follow algorithm should have the alias
   identifier number:





Yao, et al.             Expires February 12, 2011               [Page 3]


Internet-Draft                  alias-alg                    August 2010


        +-------------------+-----------------+-------------------+
        | Description       | Mnemonic        | Original Mnemonic |
        +-------------------+-----------------+-------------------+
        | Diffie-Hellman    | alias-dh        | DH                |
        | DSA/SHA1          | alias-DSA-SHA1  | DSA/SHA1          |
        | URSA/SHA-1        | alias-RSASHA1   | RSASHA1           |
        | RSA/SHA-256       | alias-RSASHA256 | RSASHA256         |
        | RSA/SHA-512       | alias-RSASHA512 | RSASHA512         |
        | GOST R 34.10-2001 | alias-ECC-GOST  | ECC-GOST          |
        +-------------------+-----------------+-------------------+

   Other algorithm's alias identifiers will be assigned in future
   according to the future requirements.


4.  Validating the RRSIG for the new RRTYPE

   The validating resolver following this specification MUST check the
   type covered of the RRSIG before the verification.  Only when the
   validating resolver knows the RRTYPE, it can begin to verify the
   signature of the RRSIG.  Otherwise, the validating resolver MUST
   regard the RRSIG in which the type covered is unknown to the resolver
   as insecure instead of bogus.


5.  Compatiliable with the old vaildating resolver

   The old validating resolver deployed will not know the new identifier
   for the algorithm.  Zones signed according to this new specification
   MUST only use these alias algorithm identifiers for their DNSKEY RRs
   if there has the new RRTYPE in the zone.  The old resolver will treat
   the RRSIG whose algorithm identifier is unknown to them as insecure,
   otherwise the RR with the new type will be regarded as bogus if there
   is no such a mechanism.


6.  IANA Considerations

   This document updates the IANA registry "DNS SECURITY ALGORITHM
   NUMBERS".  IANA is requested to assign the algorithm number to the
   following alias algorithm identifier.










Yao, et al.             Expires February 12, 2011               [Page 4]


Internet-Draft                  alias-alg                    August 2010


   +--------+-------------------+-----------------+-------------------+
   | Number | Description       | Mnemonic        | Original Mnemonic |
   +--------+-------------------+-----------------+-------------------+
   | XX1    | Diffie-Hellman    | alias-dh        | DH                |
   | XX2    | DSA/SHA1          | alias-DSA-SHA1  | DSA/SHA1          |
   | XX3    | URSA/SHA-1        | alias-RSASHA1   | RSASHA1           |
   | XX4    | RSA/SHA-256       | alias-RSASHA256 | RSASHA256         |
   | XX5    | RSA/SHA-512       | alias-RSASHA512 | RSASHA512         |
   | XX6    | GOST R 34.10-2001 | alias-ECC-GOST  | ECC-GOST          |
   +--------+-------------------+-----------------+-------------------+


7.  Security Considerations

   TBD


8.  Acknowledgements

   Many ideas are from the discussion in the DNSOP and DNSEXT mailing
   list.  Thanks a lot to all in the list.  Many important comments and
   suggestions are contributed by many members of the DNSEXT and DNSOP
   WGs.  Thanks a lot to the DNS team members of CNNIC such as zhng li
   kun, han feng and sun guo nian.


9.  Change History

   [[anchor9: RFC Editor: Please remove this section.]]

9.1.  draft-yao-dnsext-alias-algorithm: Version 00

   o  the initial version


10.  References

10.1.  Normative References

   [EDNS0]    Vixie, P., "Extension Mechanisms for DNS (EDNS0)",
              RFC 2671, August 1999.

   [RFC1034]  Mockapetris, P., "Domain names - concepts and facilities",
              STD 13, RFC 1034, November 1987.

   [RFC1035]  Mockapetris, P., "Domain names - implementation and
              specification", STD 13, RFC 1035, November 1987.




Yao, et al.             Expires February 12, 2011               [Page 5]


Internet-Draft                  alias-alg                    August 2010


   [RFC2119]  Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
              Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.

   [RFC2136]  Vixie, P., Thomson, S., Rekhter, Y., and J. Bound,
              "Dynamic Updates in the Domain Name System (DNS UPDATE)",
              RFC 2136, April 1997.

   [RFC2671]  Vixie, P., "Extension Mechanisms for DNS (EDNS0)",
              RFC 2671, August 1999.

   [RFC3597]  Gustafsson, A., "Handling of Unknown DNS Resource Record
              (RR) Types", RFC 3597, September 2003.

   [RFC4033]  Arends, R., Austein, R., Larson, M., Massey, D., and S.
              Rose, "DNS Security Introduction and Requirements",
              RFC 4033, March 2005.

   [RFC4034]  Arends, R., Austein, R., Larson, M., Massey, D., and S.
              Rose, "Resource Records for the DNS Security Extensions",
              RFC 4034, March 2005.

   [RFC4035]  Arends, R., Austein, R., Larson, M., Massey, D., and S.
              Rose, "Protocol Modifications for the DNS Security
              Extensions", RFC 4035, March 2005.

   [RFC5155]  Laurie, B., Sisson, G., Arends, R., and D. Blacka, "DNS
              Security (DNSSEC) Hashed Authenticated Denial of
              Existence", RFC 5155, March 2008.

10.2.  Informative References

   [RFC2672bis]
              Rose, S. and W. Wijngaards, "Update to DNAME Redirection
              in the DNS", Internet-Draft ietf-dnsext-rfc2672bis-dname-
              17.txt, 6 2009.


Authors' Addresses

   Jiankang YAO
   CNNIC
   No.4 South 4th Street, Zhongguancun
   Beijing

   Phone: +86 10 58813007
   Email: yaojk@cnnic.cn





Yao, et al.             Expires February 12, 2011               [Page 6]


Internet-Draft                  alias-alg                    August 2010


   Jian Jin
   CNNIC
   No.4 South 4th Street, Zhongguancun
   Beijing

   Phone: +86 10 58813000
   Email: jinjian@cnnic.cn


   Wei MAO
   CNNIC
   No.4 South 4th Street, Zhongguancun
   Beijing

   Phone: +86 10 58812230
   Email: maowei_ietf@cnnic.cn



































Yao, et al.             Expires February 12, 2011               [Page 7]